Application and jury decision
The administrator separates eligibility checks from independent review. After the decision, the coordinator sees the participant’s response deadline and the documents needed for accommodation or payment.
Custom Development
An open-call application moves from eligibility screening to a jury decision and project reporting. We’ll build a CRM around your program’s rules, with separate roles for applicants, reviewers and residency coordinators.
These modules can be included in the project. We’ll agree on the scope and workflow rules after reviewing your processes.
The administrator separates eligibility checks from independent review. After the decision, the coordinator sees the participant’s response deadline and the documents needed for accommodation or payment.
The secretary assigns applications by expertise and tracks recusals and deadlines. When a reviewer changes, the team can see which submissions still need a decision.
The coordinator agrees on dates, studio access and final materials. The final handover is confirmed under the program’s requirements.
How teams can divide responsibilities and handle exceptions after rollout.
A reviewer discloses a connection to the applicant. The coordinator assigns another reviewer, and the final decision record includes only eligible votes.
The selected artist confirms the materials and equipment needed. The coordinator checks studio availability and agrees on changes with the mentor.
We’ll use one open call to cover eligibility checks, reviewer access and the jury decision version. The coordinator receives records for accepted artists with a workspace, arrival date and responsibilities. We’ll also cover a declined place and an invitation from the reserve list.
Once we agree on the requirements, we design the screens, build a pilot, and try it against the agreed use cases. We plan the rollout and follow-on modules with your team.
Discuss the First PhaseThe reviewer can record a recusal and reason, lose access to the application and have it reassigned to another juror.
We’ll first establish which information must be hidden at each stage. Portfolios need a separate review because they may contain the artist’s name.
We’ll match calls, application numbers, portfolios and assigned reviewers. On a sample, the secretary checks submitted scores, open recusals and deadlines. For anonymous review, we’ll check which fields and files the jury can see after import.
We’ll follow one open call from intake through the jury decision and confirmation of the next stage. Scope depends on anonymity rules, reviewer replacements and portfolio access. Studio booking or grantee reporting can be explored on one approved project.
Tell us your industry, describe one process you want to automate, and let us know which tools your team already uses.